AGOCG logo
Graphics Multimedia VR Visualisation Contents
Training Reports Workshops Briefings Index
Back Next

3.2 Detailed results

3.2.5 Image processing packages

Readers should consult the comments under Graphics Software. Many of the same points can be made for Image Processing Software. The software was used more or less throughout the social sciences. Most questionnaire replies came from geography and sociology and social policy but no one subject area dominates. Equally, a number of different packages are in use. Adobe Photoshop and Paintshop Pro were most frequently used but we also received reports on the use of nine other packages.

Responses were received for the following 11 software products.

Adobe Illustrator

Survey results suggest that Adobe Illustrator has no users in the social sciences! We did, however, receive one review from a software-training agency. These views are described here.

Adobe Illustrator was used for

Its particular advantages were that it is the industry standard and works well with other graphics software. However, it is not easily compatible with WORD and Windows PC users cannot easily send images to a non-graphics PC user. Further it was described as easy to use once trained but not easy for a beginner to pick up.

In terms of software development it was suggested that a warning dialogue box appearing on save advising of files size and offering compression would be useful.

Adobe Photoshop

We received a number of reports on the use of Adobe Photoshop versions 3 and 4 running under Windows and Windows NT and on Macs. The software was used in teaching and research and was generally found to be useful and easy to use.

Specifically Adobe Illustrator was used in:

Particular advantages included:

Disadvantages were listed as:

Users would like to see the software developed to allow the importation of postscript files and a new, less cluttered, interface.

ASAP

We received one report on the use of ASAP in the social sciences. Version 1 running under Windows 3.1 was being used for teaching. ASAP was described as 'A brilliantly simple programme for preparing slides . . . more advanced programmes, like Freelance Graphics or PowerPoint, cannot compete.'

Particular advantages were listed as:

Problems with ASAP included:

These could equally be regarded as areas for software development. The reviewer also commented that 'Software developers miss the point. Users want simple programmes with rapid response, low requirements of hardware, maximum reliability.'

AutoCAD

We received one brief questionnaire describing the use of AutoCAD, version 13 running under Windows NT in Archaeology.

The software was being used in the generation of 2D and 3D Drawings and in digitising. Used in both teaching and research, AutoCAD was described as being very useful but quite difficult to learn.

Corel XARA

Xara was used by one respondee who was running version 1.5 under Windows 95 for the creation of web pages and printed documentation.

Its main uses were for:

The positive features of Xara were listed as:

Two negative features were listed:

In terms of software development some of the CorelDRAW features Corel Xara lacks could be added.

Ghostview

A specialised package regarded as a useful tool by a project team member.

Ghostview is freeware available both for Windows and UNIX platforms. Its main uses are for

It is described as 'A free handy tool especially for printing problems'. It could be improved by extending eps conversion to include all types of postscript files.

Image Prep

This is a specialist graphics manipulation package which has proved to be very useful for converting and enhancing graphics images - particularly photographs. Used for manipulation of scanned photographic images for research software generation eg. Visualisation programs including travel simulators. These tools facilitate a car journey to be replicated on the PC for route choice research purpose.

We received a report from a user in Transport Studies carrying our research running version 4 of Image Prep. They regarded the software as being quite easy to use and very useful.

The most used features of the software were:

The most valuable feature of the software was the Photo image enhancing facility. In some parts of the software it was difficult to know what all of the features and processes do however.

Imagetool

We received no reports of Imagetool being used by social scientists. If you are using it we would like to hear from you! The one completed questionnaire received was from a member of the project team in Computing Services who felt it would be of value to social scientists.

Imagetool is a free package with powerful image processing capabilities. Its main use is image analysis and it is quite easy to use. Developed by UTHCSA, as will all freeware, Imagetool has no guaranteed future development and no direct support.

LView Pro

Surprisingly few social scientists reported using LView in either their teaching or research. It may be that it was felt to be a utility rather than a visualisation tool and it is certainly in more widespread use that our survey results suggest.

LView is freeware. Its main use is to convert from one image file format to another. A large number of image formats are supported. It also has other features. Images may be increased or reduced in size. Image resolution may be altered and features such as colour and contrast may be adjusted. The software is particularly valuable in the preparation of images for importation into word-processing or desktop publishing packages. It is also of worth in the preparation of images for placing onto the World Wide Web.

Micrographx

We received one questionnaire concerned with Micrographx 4.1 running in a Windows environment on a 486 PC.

The software has a number of uses:

As a translator to convert into different file formats

To annotate graphic output from other software

To draw illustrations

Micrographx was described as very easy to use and very useful - powerful software with a large array of functions. However, it was also described as often being slow and subject to crashing when working on large files with complex objects.

Paintshop Pro

Paintshop Pro was not used as widely as might have been expected. Just 4 questionnaires referred to it. It was used both in teaching and research. Paintshop Pro is regarded as easy to use and useful.

It was used for:

Digital image editing down to pixel level

Conversion between different image file formats

Line drawing

Image cleaning

In WWW site creation

Its advantages were listed as:

Relatively small size software, but still lots of useful image manipulation functions are included

Cheap

Robust

Good Mailing List support

Good Documentation (on line and paper)

Paintshop Pro's disadvantages include:

You cannot view how an image will look when you print out the edited picture. The only way is to try test printing several times.

Suggested improvements included:

WYSIWYG function is required

Better re-sampling process is required (compared to Picture Publisher, reducing the size by re-sampling results in quite poor image quality)

VRML support

Graphics     Multimedia      Virtual Environments      Visualisation      Contents