![]() |
||||
Contents
THE WORLD WIDE WEB AND ITS CONTRIBUTION TO FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING
Learners cited a number of reasons as to why they had started using the Web initially. Fifteen started through “interest” or “curiosity”—four specifically referring to “the hype” surrounding it, one calling it “a new toy”—ten needed to carry out research for essay, project or course work, four said it was recommended by friends, two said it was recommended by staff, and two needed to access course notes delivered on the Web.
Learners also claimed to use the Web with varying levels of frequency. Nineteen used it less than once a week and seventeen used it once or twice a week. Five used it as many as four times a week, with four claiming to use it at least once a day. Most Web sessions, according to twenty-one questionnaire respondents, last between one and two hours, while eighteen suggested that they lasted thirty minutes or less. Eight others said timing varied, especially when Web delivery is “slow”. The questionnaire did not ask how long respondents had been using the Web, but most learners in the interview study had only been using it for up to nine months.
Most learners, however, seem to view the main value of the Web as a source of information about the countries whose languages they are studying (seventy-one different examples were given). Thirteen specifically mentioned the value of up-to date materials, while three suggested that some sources on the Web would not be available elsewhere. Certain information is thus being made far more accessible than it would otherwise be.
In the questionnaire study, nineteen learners gave examples of recent search aims. These varied widely but without exception were all topic focused. One explanation for this response is that a large number of courses now require or recommend the use of the Web, a total of fifteen courses being mentioned. Information being searched for included:
very confident quite confident not at all confident
using computers 30 46 14
using a mouse 55 32 3
using Windows 40 39 11
using email 42 34 14
using computer-based 28 34 28
language resources
using World Wide Web 12 29 49
Total = 90 (several of the 92 respondents did not answer every question.)
Despite, this lack of confidence in their technical skills, the observation study revealed (see 4.2.2) that some learners were able to use the basic facilities of Netscape such as ‘bookmarks’ and the ‘Netsearch’ button in order to navigate, although not all users were aware of the print facilities. Only one or two of the more proficient Web users had developed skills to reduce the waiting time for documents to download by, for example, switching off the images, or to minimise printing out time by cutting and pasting from multiple information sources into a single Word or Notepad document before printing.
Keyword searches seemed to be the most common starting point. The Webcrawler and the Netsearch button provided the normal entry route rather than the use of a known Web site address. In the observation study, seven out of the eleven users accessed resources in this way. Others used known Web site addresses: addresses ‘bookmarked’ by tutors; topic buttons on Netsearch (e.g. ‘sport’ to search for information on rugby in France); ‘homepage’ directories of commonly used Web sites; registered-user access to online foreign language journals with their own search facilities.
A fairly typical example of a search pattern and the steps it involved was given by a Spanish language student seeking information on the Spanish election results:
Go to Webcrawler - type in keywords Spanish and elections - check all finds - return to ‘Webcrawler’ - amend search by translating keywords into Spanish.
Both the questionnaires and the observation study revealed that search terms chosen were sometimes very broad in the first instance, suggesting that users had little perception of how vast the amount of material available on the Web was. Some frustration was evident during observations and from questionnaire comments indicating that the time-consuming and laborious process of checking through endless lists of ‘finds’ did always not turn up the kind of information users were seeking. The idea of regularly reviewing and amending search terms, particularly during the initial stages of a search, did not always seem to occur to users.
Of the nineteen users who completed Question Five of the questionnaire (eliciting an example of the various steps involved in a typical search they had undertaken), only five mentioned amending their initial search procedure by broadening, narrowing or changing the keywords they used. An equal number of users concluded by indicating that the amount of unsolicited information that their searches had produced meant that they could not locate the information they were seeking. One user reported that they had abandoned their search for information on “natural resources and ecology in the third world” after typing in the keywords ecology, pollution, earthquakes which produced “too many finds” and “sources (that were) too complicated”.
When users did amend their choice of search words, they sometimes made their searches unrealistically narrow and predictably received no results, or they employed the opposite strategy which resulted in an equally unsuccessful outcome. This was exemplified during one of the observations when a user, seeking information relating for his year abroad in a French university, first typed in the full name of the institution in France. When this failed to produce any finds, he amended the keywords to the type of institution (École Polytechnique) which produced possibly the entire list (100) of such institutions in France. Later still he broadened the search terms to Éducation + Paris (where his institution was located) which resulted in an even greater number of finds (698).
Needless to say, this rather hit-and-miss unskilled approach to searching seemed to be the source of at least some of the frustration experienced by many Web users. On the other hand, some users admitted to making extremely useful finds more by luck than design. Those who may have benefited most from this kind of Web searching pattern could well have been users whose learning objectives were less clearly defined. For example, a student with a concept around which she wanted to write her essay (values of the French Revolution and their relation to contemporary French politics) but without a precisely formulated essay title, was able to use the range of vaguely related material she had found on the Web as a stimulus to provide her with different perspectives on the topic and to move towards focusing in on a possible essay title. A rather unfocused style of searching even when there is a specific study-related aim involved, can have some benefits in this respect, helping you, as one user put it, to “get on to topics more interesting than the one you're supposed to be learning”.
Contents
Graphics Multimedia Virtual Environments Visualisation Contents