This report is also available as an Acrobat file.
Contents
Appendix 3
Usability Questionnaire
The following questionnaire was given to each subject after the 'artifical' studies. A similar questionnaire was also used after the 'real world' study.
Questions 1 to 18 were answered using the following scale:
| | | | |
---------------------------------------------------------------
Disagree Disagree Neither agree Agree Agree
Strongly Nor Disagree Strongly
- The discussions held over the system went well.
- It was difficult to initiate eye contact.
- The update rate of the screen was sufficient for the discussion we held.
- It was easy to identify who was speaking.
- The system set up was not well suited to the type of tasks we did.
- It was possible to fully express what I wanted over the system.
- Gestures by the other participants were unclear.
- The quality of the image in terms of resolution was adequate for the
- uses we made of the system.
- The vocies of the participants were not clear
- It was easy to reach conlcusion to our discussions
- It was hard to judge when to speak and when to wait
- It was easy to maintain eye contact
- The display adversely affected the exahnage of information between participants.
- The dicsussion we held were only possible using the system set up
- rather than a normal phonecall.
- It was clear what all the participants thought about the discussion at different times
- It was difficult to write as well as stay involved in the dicussions using the system
- The system enabled the group to build a rapport with one another.
- The position of the cameras was not acceptable for the dicussions we held.
- Do you have any other comments about the videoconferencing system.
- What type of tasks did you use the system for
Thank you for taking the time to fill in this questionnaire
Contents
Graphics Multimedia
Virtual Environments Visualisation
Contents