AGOCG logo
Graphics Multimedia VR Visualization Contents
Training Reports Workshops Briefings Index
This report is also available as an Acrobat file.
Back Next
Multimedia Presentations Workshop

Working Group 1 - Software Tools.

Chair: Stuart Hirst


This group will look at what is required in a good presentation tool, at what tools people are currently using, and their strengths and weaknesses. Issues such as portability of the final presentation, ability to incorporate a variety of media, etc., should be addressed. This group should look to produce recommendations, perhaps not for a particular tool, but criteria that could be used to select a tool.


The group first looked at some of the reason why people did not feel comfortable developing electronic presentations, and at what features would be required by a package suitable for novice users. They felt it was necessary to differentiate between development and delivery tools, as much of a presentation could be developed in a word processing package, provided the presentation package had the facility to import (and export) to and from other packages.

One barrier to encouraging the use of presentation tools was users being frightened of technical/programming packages. Therefore the structured templates (e.g., PowerPoint's Wizards) can be very useful, but they obviously do impose a structure and 'look' on all presentations.

It was felt there was the need to distinguish between presentation packages and authoring tools. While authoring tools could be used to deliver presentations, the development overhead may be too large. The main advantages of authoring tools over current presentation packages were thought to be:

The support for non-linear narratives is particularly important, as it allows for some degree of interactivity with the audience. This need for interactivity, which is not really present in current presentation packages, was felt to be at least as important as the ability to include multimedia. The easiest system to use which provides this non-linear support is the World Wide Web, and this should be considered when selecting a presentation tool.

The group then when on to create a schematic of an integrated software tool environment. (Fig 1)

Figure 1 Schematic of an integrated software tool environment

This was envisaged as a cartwheel, with an inner core of basic software tools and the support tools around the rim. A presenter could therefore start generating their presentation in any of the core tools with which they were already familiar. The outer rim represents an external resource, either local or networked, of not only software tools but also media clips held in a data bank. Issues such as synchronisation of audio and video would be dealt with by tools in the rim.

One of the main problems with multimedia is the time and resources necessary to create it, and the data bank(s) would be necessary to encourage presenters to use multimedia. These were seen to be collections of clips produced by other institutions and perhaps commercial clips for which copyright was either waived or less constrained due to academic or educational usage.

In order to make use of this kind of environment the core presentation tool must meet a number of requirements:


An ideal multimedia presentation tool should meet the following requirements: There is the need for a data base of copyright cleared media clips which can be used by lecturers to illustrate presentations
Back Next

Graphics     Multimedia      Virtual Environments      Visualisation      Contents